Skip to content
Docksoft

Code Review

A

code-review

Perform thorough code reviews with structured feedback.

code-reviewsentryfeedbackquality

Install

npx skills add getsentry/code-review
Author
Sentry
License
MIT
Updated
February 2026
Type
Single skill
Document
2.7 KB
Platforms
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Multi Platform
View source

SKILL.md

Sentry Code Review

Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.

Review Checklist

Identifying Problems

Look for these issues in code changes:

  • Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
  • Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
  • Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
  • Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
  • ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
  • Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure

Design Assessment

  • Do component interactions make logical sense?
  • Does the change align with existing project architecture?
  • Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?

Test Coverage

Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:

  • Functional tests for business logic
  • Integration tests for component interactions
  • End-to-end tests for critical user paths

Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.

Long-Term Impact

Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:

  • Database schema modifications
  • API contract changes
  • New framework or library adoption
  • Performance-critical code paths
  • Security-sensitive functionality

Feedback Guidelines

Tone

  • Be polite and empathetic
  • Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
  • Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"

Approval

  • Approve when only minor issues remain
  • Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
  • Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code

Common Patterns to Flag

Python/Django

# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
    print(user.profile.name)  # Separate query per user

# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')

TypeScript/React

// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, []);  // userId not in deps

// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);

Security

# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")

# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])

References

Related

Code Quality & Testing

A

.NET Diagnostics

dotnet-diag

.NET performance investigations, debugging, and incident analysis: dump analysis, perf profiling, GC tracing, async hangs, and production triage workflows.

claude-codegithub-copilotcursor+1MIT

Code Quality & Testing

S

.NET Test

dotnet-test

Run, diagnose, and migrate .NET tests: test execution, filtering, platform detection, MSTest workflows, coverage analysis, anti-patterns, and migrations across xUnit/MSTest versions.

claude-codegithub-copilotcursor+1MIT

Code Quality & Testing

A

Find Bugs

find-bugs

Systematic bug detection using static analysis patterns and code inspection.

claude-codecodexcursor+1MIT

Agent tooling

Want agents that know your stack?

This index is ours, and so is the tooling behind it. If your team wants agents that understand how your own systems actually work, that is a thing we build.

Contact the dock

One address, read by the people who would do the work. No intake form, no calendar link — just an email.

tphamdn@gmail.com
Other reasons to writeWe reply within two business days