Skip to content
Docksoft

GH Fix CI

A

gh-fix-ci

Debug and fix failing GitHub Actions PR checks using log inspection and analysis.

ci-cdgithub-actionsdebuggingautomation

Install

npx skills add openai/gh-fix-ci
Author
OpenAI
License
MIT
Updated
February 2026
Type
Single skill
Document
3.6 KB
Platforms
Codex, Claude Code, Multi Platform
View source

SKILL.md

Gh Pr Checks Plan Fix

Overview

Use gh to locate failing PR checks, fetch GitHub Actions logs for actionable failures, summarize the failure snippet, then propose a fix plan and implement after explicit approval.

  • If a plan-oriented skill (for example create-plan) is available, use it; otherwise draft a concise plan inline and request approval before implementing.

Prereq: authenticate with the standard GitHub CLI once (for example, run gh auth login), then confirm with gh auth status (repo + workflow scopes are typically required).

Inputs

  • repo: path inside the repo (default .)
  • pr: PR number or URL (optional; defaults to current branch PR)
  • gh authentication for the repo host

Quick start

  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"
  • Add --json if you want machine-friendly output for summarization.

Workflow

  1. Verify gh authentication.
    • Run gh auth status in the repo.
    • If unauthenticated, ask the user to run gh auth login (ensuring repo + workflow scopes) before proceeding.
  2. Resolve the PR.
    • Prefer the current branch PR: gh pr view --json number,url.
    • If the user provides a PR number or URL, use that directly.
  3. Inspect failing checks (GitHub Actions only).
    • Preferred: run the bundled script (handles gh field drift and job-log fallbacks):
      • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"
      • Add --json for machine-friendly output.
    • Manual fallback:
      • gh pr checks <pr> --json name,state,bucket,link,startedAt,completedAt,workflow
        • If a field is rejected, rerun with the available fields reported by gh.
      • For each failing check, extract the run id from detailsUrl and run:
        • gh run view <run_id> --json name,workflowName,conclusion,status,url,event,headBranch,headSha
        • gh run view <run_id> --log
      • If the run log says it is still in progress, fetch job logs directly:
        • gh api "/repos/<owner>/<repo>/actions/jobs/<job_id>/logs" > "<path>"
  4. Scope non-GitHub Actions checks.
    • If detailsUrl is not a GitHub Actions run, label it as external and only report the URL.
    • Do not attempt Buildkite or other providers; keep the workflow lean.
  5. Summarize failures for the user.
    • Provide the failing check name, run URL (if any), and a concise log snippet.
    • Call out missing logs explicitly.
  6. Create a plan.
    • Use the create-plan skill to draft a concise plan and request approval.
  7. Implement after approval.
    • Apply the approved plan, summarize diffs/tests, and ask about opening a PR.
  8. Recheck status.
    • After changes, suggest re-running the relevant tests and gh pr checks to confirm.

Bundled Resources

scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py

Fetch failing PR checks, pull GitHub Actions logs, and extract a failure snippet. Exits non-zero when failures remain so it can be used in automation.

Usage examples:

  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "123"
  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123" --json
  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --max-lines 200 --context 40

Related

Code Quality & Testing

A

.NET Diagnostics

dotnet-diag

.NET performance investigations, debugging, and incident analysis: dump analysis, perf profiling, GC tracing, async hangs, and production triage workflows.

claude-codegithub-copilotcursor+1MIT

Code Quality & Testing

S

.NET Test

dotnet-test

Run, diagnose, and migrate .NET tests: test execution, filtering, platform detection, MSTest workflows, coverage analysis, anti-patterns, and migrations across xUnit/MSTest versions.

claude-codegithub-copilotcursor+1MIT

Code Quality & Testing

A

Code Review

code-review

Perform thorough code reviews with structured feedback.

claude-codecodexcursor+1MIT

Agent tooling

Want agents that know your stack?

This index is ours, and so is the tooling behind it. If your team wants agents that understand how your own systems actually work, that is a thing we build.

Contact the dock

One address, read by the people who would do the work. No intake form, no calendar link — just an email.

tphamdn@gmail.com
Other reasons to writeWe reply within two business days